Categories
Australia Banking CBDCs Crypto News Cryptocurrencies Regulation Stablecoins

Outgoing RBA Policymaker Thinks CBDCs and Global Regulation Will Undermine Crypto

Dr Tony Richards, the soon-to-retire head of payments policy at the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), has warned local investors they should be wary of speculating on digital currencies as regulation and CBDC development could threaten the crypto market.

Richards stated in his November 18 speech to the Australian Corporate Treasury Association that one of the topics that “generated the most discussion, conversation and debate in the nearly 10 years” of his time at the RBA was “the emergence of distributed ledger technology, cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, and the prospective emergence of central bank digital currencies”.

Dr Tony Richards, RBA’s outgoing head of payments policy.

The Same Ol’ Strawmen

Richards warned of excessive hype around crypto, citing instances like Dogecoin “that was started as a joke in late 2013 [and] had an implied market capitalisation as high as US$88 billion in June this year”, fuelled mainly by “influencers and celebrity tweets”. The RBA has previously also discussed the risk of meme coins and DeFi in monetary policy meetings.

The RBA has signalled that if a regulatory crackdown should occur, thousands of private currencies that have emerged on the back of the soaring bitcoin price would become unnecessary. It has also targeted Proof-of-Work’s energy consumption and how crypto facilitates financial crimes and illegal activities such as ransom demands.

Additionally, after COP26, Richards warned: “The very high use of energy involved in mining proof-of-work cryptocurrencies could attract greater attention from governments and policymakers.” The combined energy use for the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks was estimated to be similar to that of the world’s 13th-largest economy, he said.

However, Jon Deane, chief executive officer of Trovio, a digital asset infrastructure adviser and asset manager, disputed Richards’ comments on crypto’s environmental impact, saying that 57 percent of bitcoin mining uses renewable energy sources.

Regulation Could Reduce Crypto to “Only Niche Use Cases”

“If there were to be global policy action to deal with some particular concerns about the use of cryptocurrencies, plus the arrival of new stablecoins and CBDCs, that could safely meet the needs of a wide range of users, existing cryptocurrencies might then have only niche use cases, at best,” Richards said, adding that “much of the official sector globally remains sceptical of developments in the cryptocurrency market”.

Reaction from the crypto community was swift and predictable:

Steve Vallas, chief executive of Blockchain Australia, retorted that “it continues to be our experience that hawkish views about cryptocurrency are driven by entrenched narratives around bad actors and financial crime, narratives that are not supported by the data”.

Could CBDCs Undermine the Use of Crypto?

Richards is of the opinion that the rise of crypto is not yet an issue threatening financial stability, but the RBA expects global central banks to move to assert control over digital finance and respond to the growth of bitcoin and other coins by issuing CBDCs.

He believes CBDCs “would be denominated in fiat currencies, be safer than existing stablecoins, and would likely have faster, safer and more efficient transaction verification mechanisms than most cryptocurrencies”, and would likely be “viewed as superior instruments for the settlement of transactions in tokenised assets on distributed ledgers”.

But according to Deane, “People buy bitcoin to move away from the devaluation of fiat currencies by central banks to a finite resource that acts as both a store of value and ultimate settlement layer”.

Dr Richards concluded that banks would continue to work with the private sector and international counterparts to ensure they stay abreast of innovations in the payments system, with the RBA even hiring CBDC researchers. There is significant work still to be done with the other financial regulators and the parliament to ensure that Australia has a fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for digital assets.

Categories
Crypto News Cryptocurrencies DeFi Payments Stablecoins

RBA Discusses Future of Payments in Australia and Cryptocurrency ‘Risks’

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has discussed the need to regulate stablecoin usage in the application of DeFi for payments, and also noted the “considerable risks” associated with meme coins during its November monetary policy meeting.

In the meeting’s minutes, the RBA acknowledged innovations such as distributed-ledger and smart contracts could change the face of the financial sector but that it would likely rely on the use of stablecoins or CBDCs rather than cryptocurrencies. The RBA said:

… if stablecoins were to be used widely, they should be subject to regulation that ensured they were safe for users and promoted financial stability.

Reserve Bank of Australia members

In considering the future of digital assets in payment, the RBA hit out at cryptocurrencies, which it described as having “numerous shortcomings as stores of value or means of payment”. 

The central bank said the risks and speculative nature of crypto investment was especially obvious when it came to “meme coins”, and noted warnings that investors caught up in the recent boom could experience large losses. 

Crypto Risks a Focus Even As Regulators Explore CBDCs

Australia’s financial regulators continue to warn investors about cryptocurrencies, even as they tentatively consider the possibilities of CBDCs. 

In August, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) reiterated its warning for Aussies to be wary of investing in unlicensed companies – that is, companies that do not hold an Australian financial services (AFS) licence or an Australian market licence (AML).

The RBA also used its November meeting to express its support for CBDC-related initiatives including developing a proof-of-concept of a wholesale CBDC in 2019 and the recently completed Project Atom, which explored the potential use of a central bank CBDC using distributed ledger technology in collaboration with blockchain company ConsenSys.

In addition, the RBA recently advertised it was seeking to hire people for a new cross-disciplinary “CBDC Research Team” to support the evolution of payments in Australia.

Categories
Banking Crypto News DeFi Stablecoins

$1 Trillion Banking Giant ING ‘Exploring’ Peer-To-Peer DeFi Lending

In the world of crypto, 2021 has been a watershed year – from bitcoin becoming legal tender to NFT mania and then, of course, the absolute explosion in DeFi. Traditional finance is scrambling to keep up with the pace of innovation. ING, the Dutch financial services giant, is the latest wanting to get in on the act.

ING Dips Toes into DeFi

ING, with US$1 trillion under management, made a presentation at the Singapore Fintech Festival where it announced that it was working on a trial of its DeFi, peer-to-peer lending protocol with the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets.

We are looking into peer-to-peer lending in a DeFi kind of setup. But then not on bitcoins. What is interesting to us is how you can probably create peer-to-peer lending or open up lending capabilities with different kinds of collateral. So with different ways of doing this rather than with volatile bitcoin.

Annerie Vreugdenhil, chief innovation officer, ING

In a white paper published earlier this year, ING outlined how lending protocol Aave, built atop the Ethereum blockchain, was one of the more promising examples of innovation in the industry. Leveraging smart contracts, Aave would enable borrowers to deposit crypto as collateral and take out stablecoin loans.

Despite recognising the benefits of DeFi (borderless payments, 24/7 operations and speed of transactions), the white paper noted several material drawbacks.

One main drawback highlighted by ING was that since borrowing and lending required collateral, it would not enable the creation of new money that could otherwise be used for financing entrepreneurial activities.

In short, ING’s objection appears to be that the very notion of DeFi runs counter to the foundation of fractional reserve banking, on which its entire business is founded. This concern from a legacy company is of course unsurprising, and time will tell how it reconciles current operations with DeFi.

DeFi Adoption Goes Parabolic in 2021

Since the beginning of the year, the total value locked in DeFi has increased more than tenfold. That said, there have been innumerable instances of hacks, leaks and breaches in 2021 – some of the higher-profile instances included Indexed FinanceZabu Finance and C.R.E.A.M Finance.

While these hacks may serve to slow down adoption in the short run, traditional financial institutions would be well advised to keep their eye on the ball to ensure they are not left behind in the wake of unprecedented innovation.

As an example of an institution that doesn’t want to be left behind, consider Australia’s Commonwealth Bank, which last week announced that its customers would be able to buy crypto natively through its banking interface. If you can’t beat them, join them.

Categories
Regulation Stablecoins Tether

Tether Introduces Controversial ‘Travel Rule’ to Combat Financial Crimes

Tether Holdings Limited – issuer of the stablecoin USDT – has announced the integration of Notabene’s end-to-end solution to comply with AML (anti-money laundering) laws and combat cross-border crime. 

Tether to Comply with AML and KYC Laws

As per an announcement on October 26, Tether will test Notabene’s platform to facilitate compliance with the Crypto Travel Rule, a mandate established by global financial watchdog Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on June 20, 2021.

The mandate stipulates that Virtual Assets Service Providers (VASPs) (such as crypto exchange and stablecoin issuers) should be regulated in the same way that regular financial institutions do. Thus, VASPs would have to comply with AML and KYC laws, providing descriptive information between counterparties when transferring digital assets.

It’s important that we work with other large VASPS to build this industry from the ground up. We see this as an opportune moment to foster cooperation across traditional and digital channels in order to create better services for customers globally. We are proud to lead the charge on behalf of all stablecoins in order to make a positive change towards protecting our clients.

Leonardo Real, CCO, Tether

‘Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?’

Tether has repeatedly claimed its USDT reserves are a conglomerate of several assets, including commercial paper and fiduciary deposits, with only 3.87 percent in cash. Yet Tether’s detractors are not convinced.

Two weeks ago, Bloomberg released a hit piece targeting Tether, titled “Anyone Seen Tether’s billions?” The author, Zeke Faux, calls the company a fraud, and claims that the firm has loaned billions of dollars to various crypto companies, and that it holds debt with various Chinese firms, including real-estate giant Evergrande.

Categories
Crypto News Stablecoins Tether

Tether Calls Latest Bloomberg Hit Piece a ‘Tired Attempt to Undermine its Business’

Stablecoin issuer Tether is not so comfortable with a recent investigative report by Bloomberg, calling it a “tired attempt to undermine its business”. 

Where Are Tether’s Billions?

Bloomberg’s Zeke Faux is the author of the report, titled Anyone Seen Tether’s Billions?, which has put Tether in the spotlight by revealing the company has loaned billions of dollars to crypto companies, including crypto lender Celsius Network.

[Faux’s] article does nothing more than attempt to perpetuate a false and ageing story arc about Tether based on innuendo and misinformation, shared by disgruntled individuals with no involvement with or direct knowledge of the business’s operations. It’s another tired attempt to undermine a market leader whose track record of innovation, liquidity and success speaks for itself.

Tether statement

Celsius provides retailers with interest accounts. The crypto bank has been subject to scrutiny as US regulators consider these interest accounts unregistered securities.

Tether and its Involvement With Chinese Firms

It was also revealed that Tether is holding Chinese debt, lending billions of dollars to Chinese firms using bitcoin as collateral. One of these firms is Evergrande, reportedly close to defaulting on its debt payments. Tether has repeatedly denied all ties to the cash-strapped real estate group.

Chinese real-estate company Evergrande is facing a debt crisis after years of risky borrowing. Some analysts say it is the world’s most indebted real estate developer.

Last month, Crypto News Australia reported that Tether and its parent company, Bitfinex, had filed a petition to the Supreme Court of New York to block an information request submitted by CoinDesk.

A week ago, Bitfinex won a class-action lawsuit levelled against Tether, claiming it was a “clumsy attempt at a money grab”.

Categories
Crypto News Insurance Stablecoins Tether

US Considering $250k Deposit Insurance for Stablecoin Holders

One of the obvious downsides to participating in the stablecoin market is that there isn’t any deposit insurance for holders. No one is going to bail you out if the custodian goes belly up. However, that may soon change, according to a report suggesting the US government is considering deposit insurance for stablecoin holders.

FDIC Insurance May Apply to Stablecoins

The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) is an independent agency of the US government that protects against losses if an insured bank fails, up to maximum of US$250,000. Australia has a similar mechanism in place known as the Financial Claims Scheme (FCS), which provides account holders with protection against losses of up to A$250,000.

A number of undisclosed sources close to the FDIC have suggested that stablecoins may indeed be eligible for coverage.

Stablecoins, which are supposed to be redeemable on a 1:1 basis for cash, have been under regulatory scrutiny of late, largely due to the lack of transparency in their reserves composition. While they enjoy the advantage of instant, final settlement, stablecoins are not insured by the government against losses.

Tether revealed in May that only 3.87 percent of its reserves were cash and that over 65 percent was commercial paper. Last month, it asked a court to block the release of its latest reserves, citing “harm to its competitive position”. Circle, the company behind USDC, revealed earlier this year that over 60 percent of reserves were in cash, but in August said it would be moving all of its reserves across to cash and US treasury bonds.

Not Straightforward

A former FDIC lawyer familiar with the inner workings of the organisation notes that:

The FDIC is probably looking at whether stablecoins can count as deposits or whether someone’s ownership of a stablecoin is a deposit at the stablecoin issuer.

Todd Phillips, director of financial regulation and corporate governance, Center for American Progress

Phillips noted that one challenge would be keeping track of who could be insured: “One thing to remember is that each person has insurance of only up to $250,000 … so, the stablecoin issuer would need to keep track of who is the current holder of their stablecoin and how many they own.”

Despite the challenges, Phillips recognised that FDIC insured stablecoins would be a tremendous boost to consumer confidence and trust in the sector.

Just as how the FDIC’s logo on a bank’s website allows savers to be confident that the bank is safe, insurance of particular stablecoins and permission to use the FDIC logo would provide clarity about which stablecoins, up to the insurance limit, will not lose value.

Todd Phillips

Looking into the future, one Twitter commentator had a particularly insightful take on the matter:

Much of crypto’s “wild west” reputation stems from the lack of consumer protection available. Users are often told, quite rightly, to DYOR (do your own research). If, however, the crypto industry is ultimately wanting to “broaden the tent”, FDIC insurance for stablecoins may just be a big step in the right direction.

Categories
Banking Blockchain Crypto News Payments Stablecoins Stellar

Payment Juggernaut Partners with Stellar and USDC for Blockchain-Based Payments

MoneyGram, one of the major global remittance services, has partnered with the Stellar Foundation (XLM) to provide a bridge between digital assets and local currencies for consumers, with United Texas Bank serving as the settlement bank between USDC issuer Circle and MoneyGram.

A Bridge From Traditional Finance to Digital Assets

On October 6, MoneyGram announced it would be using the Stellar blockchain to facilitate instant and cheap transactions. The bridge will allow “money transfers and enables near-instant settlement in USDC, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar developed by Circle”.

The pilot project started in the fourth quarter of this year and will be rolled out slowly during early 2022. The blockchain-enabled bridge for USDC stablecoins and local currencies will connect MoneyGram’s 150 million or so consumers to the blockchain.

Denelle Dixon, CEO and executive director of the Stellar Development Foundation, stated that “we’re trying to go as big as we can”.

Working with MoneyGram allows end consumers to have on- and off-ramps everywhere that MoneyGram’s vast agent network supports it. So this is just transformational in terms of being able to exchange crypto for fiat and fiat for crypto,

Denelle Dixon, CEO and executive director, Stellar Development Foundation

This means that any digital wallet connected to the Stellar network can leverage any of MoneyGram’s 400,000 locations across the globe to send and receive remittances in various fiat currencies.

MoneyGram has joined Visa, which is also in the process of creating a blockchain-based bridge for international Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) to increase the ease, cost and speed with which people can make payments.

Ripple’s Relationship with MoneyGram Winding Down

Ripple (XRP) has had a longstanding relationship with MoneyGram that started in 2019, but it has been winding down since the US Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit against Ripple in December 2020, saying the firm had violated federal securities laws.

However, MoneyGram’s chairman and CEO Alex Holmes has stated that the partnership with Stellar is an entirely different animal from the relationship MoneyGram had with Ripple, which leveraged the crypto firm’s on-demand liquidity (ODL) to facilitate foreign exchange (FX) trading.

The relationship MoneyGram and Stellar have is based around the direct link between consumer payments. According to Holmes, the challenge is to create a foreign exchange market in a completely new and different environment.

United Texas Bank to Facilitate Crypto Settlements

Banks are quite skittish to start dealing with crypto due to the murky regulatory space in which the industry now finds itself. Holmes stated that “United Texas bank is an established bank here and very focused on the opportunities in the crypto space. Not every bank is willing to step into the crypto world, and I think it says a lot about how progressive that bank is trying to be.”

Unfortunately, a lot of regulation ends up being a look back. I think the blockchain and digital asset worlds [have] really accelerated, and now I see a lot of regulators looking to catch up.

Alex Holmes, chairman and CEO, MoneyGram
Categories
CBDCs Coinbase Crypto Exchange Crypto News DeFi Regulation Stablecoins

SEC Chair Confirms It Has ‘No Plan to Ban Crypto’, Leaves It Up to Congress

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman Gary Gensler has confirmed the regulator has no intention of banning digital currencies and adopting a policy akin to the Chinese government’s, instead stating that any such ban “would be up to Congress”.

Gensler was appointed earlier this year, much to the joy of the crypto industry for his pro-blockchain and Bitcoin stance. Until recently he has been quiet regarding his stance on cryptos but has since broken his silence.

CBDC Looking Unlikely

At a hearing before the US House Committee on Financial Services on October 5, Gensler was questioned about whether the regulatory body had any intention of banning cryptos in favour of a prospective central bank digital currency (CBDC).

The chairman indicated that it would be up to Congress to enact such a ban. He added that the focus of the government was to ensure the crypto industry complies with investor and consumer protection, anti-money laundering and tax laws.

It’s a matter of how we get this field within the investor consumer protection that we have, and also working with bank regulators and others. How do we ensure the Treasury department has it within anti-money laundering, tax compliance? Many of these tokens do meet the test of being an investment contract, or a note, or security.

Gary Gensler, SEC chairman

Last month, the SEC issued threats to sue the crypto exchange Coinbase if it were to proceed with launching its Lend program, on the basis that Lend is a security.

Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve, similarly stated it had no intention to limit or ban the use of the US$2.2. trillion asset class.

During the house committee hearing, Gensler further addressed questions regarding cryptos, stablecoins, and the regulation of exchanges and decentralised finance (DeFi). The requirement for digital asset firms to sign up with the regulatory body was also discussed, with Gensler hinting that decentralised exchanges (DEXs) could be required to comply with the same rules.

Even in decentralised platforms – so-called DeFi platforms – there is a centralised protocol. And though they don’t take custody in the same way [as centralised exchanges], I think those are the places that we can get the maximum amount of public policy.

Gary Gensler, SEC chairman

The SEC has been “actively investigating” Uniswap Labs, the parent company of the leading DEX, Uniswap.

Stablecoins Are Like “Poker Chips” at the Casino

Gensler consolidated his position on stablecoins, indicating they may prove to be a risk for the economic system. With an estimated US$125 billion tied up in stablecoins, Gensler has described them as “poker chips” in the crypto casino, raising concerns that the market, which has grown tenfold in the past year, might be creating a system-wide risk.

Categories
Blockchain Crypto News Cryptocurrencies Stablecoins Tokens

LUNA Token Up 34% in a Week, Prints New All-Time High Following Terra Network Upgrade

Terra’s native token LUNA has been climbing in an aggressive ascent towards the US$50 mark, from around just US$10 at the end of July. The new ATH was recorded on October 4 with LUNA peaking at US$49.45 following Terra’s network upgrade.

$1 Billion Worth of LUNA Tokens Burned

The highly anticipated Columbus-5 upgrade went live on September 30, introducing changes to the Terra network that will add a deflationary mechanism to LUNA’s token economics by implementing token burns. LUNA is Terra’s utility token, used for maintaining equal value to the US dollar for Terra’s Stablecoin UST.

Since the upgrade, instead of LUNA tokens being transferred to a community pool, they are now burned whenever UST is minted. About 23.4 million LUNA tokens worth approximately US$1 billion were burned on the day of the upgrade, which resulted in LUNA’s price jump. The new deflationary model is very bullish for LUNA’s future price prediction; the more LUNA tokens that are burned and taken out of circulation, the more the asset increases in value as it becomes more scarce.

The supply burn places deflationary pressure on LUNA making it increasingly scarce … This was a key driver for recent price action.

Delphi Digital

What is the Upgrade About? 

The Columbus-5 upgrade is significant for Terra investors because it increases compatibility between Terra and other blockchain networks by enabling the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) standard. IBC will let users easily transfer LUNA, the TerraUSD (UST) stablecoin, and other assets from Terra to alternate networks and vice versa. It will position Terra to become the de facto stablecoin of the Cosmos ecosystem (a project aiming to build a network of independent blockchains communicating through IBC).

Last week, Crypto News Australia placed LUNA among the top 3 coins to watch.

Categories
Blockchain CBDCs Crypto News Payments Stablecoins Worldwide

Visa Aims to be the Bridge Connecting International CBDC Blockchains

Visa has unveiled a paper outlining the development of a protocol to make cross-border payments with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and stablecoins from any blockchain connected to the network.

According to a post by the payment colossus, the company is in the midst of developing a protocol to send digital currencies between blockchains in order to operate as a “universal payment channel” (UPC). This dedicated payment channel will connect CBDC networks between countries, as well as linking CBDCs with private stablecoin networks.

The Visa research team originally began working on the UPC concept in 2018, developing an interoperability framework that would run independently of the underlying blockchain mechanisms.

Catherine Gu, global CBDC product lead at Visa, stated that the key problem it was looking to solve is that of interoperability, to “get different digital currencies, relying on different tech stacks and protocols, with different compliance standards and market requirements to ‘talk’ to each other in a wider network of value”.

VISA’s Universal Payment Channel (UPC).

This is a much longer-term future thinking concept around a way that Visa could potentially help become a bridge between one digital currency on one blockchain and another digital currency on another blockchain.

Cuy Sheffield, Visa’s head of crypto

The Future of Blockchain is Interoperable

The paper developed by Visa’s R&D team posits the UPC as a hub interconnecting multiple blockchain networks and allowing for secure transfer of digital currencies. The point of the hub is to allow central banks, businesses and consumers to seamlessly exchange value, no matter the form factor of the currency. 

We believe that for CBDCs to be successful, they must have two essential ingredients: a great consumer experience and widespread merchant acceptance. It means the ability to make and receive payments, regardless of currency, channel, or form factor. That’s where Visa’s UPC concept comes in.

Catherine Gu, global CBDC product lead, Visa

Visa highlights the need for a UPC due to the large number of digital currencies and the necessity for a common network. The UPC’s specialised payment channels would be established off the blockchain and leverage smart contracts to communicate with the various blockchain networks. This is done to deliver high transaction throughput securely and reliably while improving overall speeds. 

Due to this gap, Visa has openly shared how the mechanics of the UPC will work, along with policy guidelines for central banks and regulators on the implication of this research.

In December 2020, Visa partnered with Circle to connect its merchants with Ethereum-based US Dollar Coins. Various other blockchain projects are also working to solve the interoperability issue.

Why CBDCs Need Cross-Chain Interoperability

Over the past two years many central banks around the world have been exploring CBDCs, a digital form of central bank money that can be used directly by consumers, merchants and financial institutions.

Imagine a world where everyone at the table is using a different type of money – some using a central bank digital currency (or CBDC) like Sweden’s eKrona, others preferring a private stablecoin like USDC […] now imagine all this happening in real-time, across multiple networks, and compatible with multiple digital wallets. 

VISA

In order to process a payment with various currencies, there needs to be a layer where all wallets and protocols can communicate with each other before processing the payment for the merchant. As part of developing the UPC concept, Visa has deployed its first-ever sample smart contract on Ethereum’s Ropsten testnet. The smart contract shows a payment channel that accepts both ether (ETH) and the USDC stablecoin.

What concerns many blockchain supporters is the idea of having a centralised node authorising transactions. However, the Visa paper states that “clients register with a UPC hub to route their transactions to other clients. Note that this routing requires zero trust to be placed on the UPC hub (the UPC hub does not need to be trusted like a central intermediary).”